The Colorado Rockies have faced a tumultuous 2024 season, marked by a staggering 44-76 record that places them firmly at the bottom of the National League standings. With such a dismal performance, it was clear that this season was one of rebuilding and reevaluation, rather than contention. Yet, as the trade deadline came and went, the Rockies’ actions—or lack thereof—at the trade deadline left many wondering if they missed a crucial opportunity to pivot and reshape their future.
One of the most prominent voices highlighting this missed opportunity is Levi Weaver of The Athletic. According to Weaver, the Rockies should have taken a hard look at trading one of their star players, Charlie Blackmon. The veteran outfielder has been the face of the Rockies franchise for several years, navigating through both the highs and lows of the team’s recent history. His tenure with the Rockies has included memorable moments such as the postseason appearances in 2017 and 2018, which have cemented his status as a beloved figure among Rockies fans.
Weaver’s suggestion to trade Blackmon, even for a relatively modest return such as a Double-A pitcher, is grounded in a practical understanding of the Rockies’ current situation. “If you could get a Double-A pitcher for Charlie Blackmon in a year where you’re 11 million games under .500, trade Charlie Blackmon,” Weaver remarked. “You can sign him next year. He can come back, and it’ll be like an old reunion tour.”
This recommendation speaks volumes about the missed strategic opportunities at the trade deadline. In a season where the Rockies are far from postseason contention, the priority should have been to capitalize on assets that could help accelerate their rebuilding process. Trading a player like Blackmon, whose contract is set to expire at the end of the season, would have allowed the Rockies to acquire prospects or young talent that could contribute to the team’s future success.
The argument for trading Blackmon is also supported by the reality of his contract status. As a free agent at the end of the year, Blackmon represents a temporary asset that could have been leveraged for immediate benefit. Even though the Rockies might have received a return that seemed minimal—such as a Double-A pitcher—the potential long-term gains from adding young talent to the organization could outweigh the short-term sentimental value of keeping Blackmon.
The situation with Blackmon highlights a broader issue with the Rockies’ approach to the trade deadline. By not actively pursuing trades for their expiring contracts or valuable players, the Rockies missed an opportunity to reshape their roster and stockpile prospects. This approach contrasts with teams that actively sell high-value assets to build for the future, demonstrating a willingness to embrace the realities of their season’s standings and focus on long-term goals.
The comparison to the Pittsburgh Pirates’ approach with Andrew McCutchen provides a useful context. The Pirates, faced with similar rebuilding challenges, traded McCutchen, only to later re-sign him, creating a scenario that allowed them to benefit from his performance while managing their roster effectively. This model demonstrates how a team can strategically manage player assets to balance current needs with future potential. The Rockies could have adopted a similar strategy with Blackmon, trading him to gain valuable assets now, with the option to bring him back if both parties saw mutual benefits in the future.
Moreover, the Rockies’ inaction at the trade deadline also raises questions about their broader strategy and vision for the team. In professional sports, particularly in leagues with such competitive parity as Major League Baseball, teams that fail to leverage their assets effectively can find themselves stuck in a cycle of mediocrity. For the Rockies, this means missing out on the chance to accelerate their rebuilding efforts and potentially fall further behind their competitors who are actively making strategic moves to enhance their rosters.
The failure to trade Blackmon also underscores the importance of having a clear, strategic plan when managing a franchise. Teams that are not in contention need to be forward-thinking, using trade deadlines as opportunities to improve their future outlook rather than clinging to the past. This approach involves making tough decisions, such as trading beloved players, to position the team for long-term success. For the Rockies, embracing this strategic mindset could have led to a more effective and proactive approach at the trade deadline.
The Colorado Rockies’ decision to hold onto Charlie Blackmon at the trade deadline, despite the team’s dire situation, reflects a missed opportunity to advance their rebuilding process. As Levi Weaver pointed out, trading Blackmon—even for a modest return—could have provided the Rockies with valuable assets to aid in their long-term strategy. By not capitalizing on this chance, the Rockies not only missed an opportunity to improve their future prospects but also highlighted a broader issue with their approach to team management and strategic planning. As the season progresses, the Rockies will need to reassess their strategy and find ways to make impactful moves that align with their goals for rebuilding and future success.
Leave a Reply