The ongoing debate surrounding Notre Dame’s quarterback, Riley Leonard, has reached a critical juncture as the team prepares for its upcoming games against Purdue and potentially Miami (Ohio). While the conversation often centers on Leonard’s recent performances and the immediate impact on the team, it’s crucial to focus on the broader implications of his health and overall well-being. Given the current situation, it would be prudent for Notre Dame to consider sitting Leonard for these next two games, not merely due to recent struggles but to ensure he fully recovers and returns to form.

Leonard’s arrival at Notre Dame was highly anticipated, bringing with him the dual-threat capabilities that the team had been missing. His ability to make plays both with his arm and legs was a key factor in the optimism surrounding his transfer from Duke. While his performance in the opener against Texas A&M showcased his potential, including a clutch game-winning drive, his play has notably declined in recent games. The most concerning aspect, however, is the physical injury that has seemingly affected his performance.

In the game against Northern Illinois, Leonard’s struggles became more apparent. After a promising start, his performance deteriorated as the game progressed, culminating in a labrum injury that has been a significant concern. A labrum injury, especially to the shoulder, can severely impact a quarterback’s ability to throw effectively and to utilize their mobility. Leonard’s diminished ability as a runner and his overall struggle with the offense indicate that the injury is more than just a minor setback.

The decision to sit Leonard should be based on a comprehensive assessment of his physical condition rather than the immediate concerns about his performance. A quarterback with a labrum injury is at a considerable disadvantage, particularly when their game relies heavily on both arm strength and mobility. The risk of exacerbating the injury by playing could lead to a more severe, potentially season-ending issue. Given the nature of shoulder injuries, Leonard’s ability to throw with accuracy and power, and to evade pressure effectively, is compromised. Therefore, it’s crucial for Notre Dame to evaluate whether Leonard’s presence on the field is worth the risk of further injury or whether it would be better to allow him time to heal properly.

Leonard’s situation brings to light a broader issue: the long-term impact of rushing an injured player back into action. Notre Dame’s approach should be informed by the experiences of other teams and players who have faced similar situations. For instance, Duke’s handling of Leonard last season, when he was injured against Notre Dame, led to further complications and missed opportunities for recovery. The decision to reintegrate him too soon resulted in a prolonged struggle that ultimately affected his entire offseason. Such cases highlight the potential consequences of not allowing sufficient time for recovery, and Notre Dame should avoid making a similar mistake.

From a strategic perspective, Notre Dame has depth at the quarterback position that can provide viable alternatives during Leonard’s absence. Steve Angeli, despite being less experienced, has shown promise and could step in for the upcoming games against Purdue and Miami (Ohio). While Angeli may not yet be a championship-caliber quarterback, his presence could be a stabilizing factor if Leonard is not fully fit. Additionally, if Leonard’s injury is indeed long-term, the team might need to consider redshirt freshman Kenny Minchey or true freshman CJ Carr. Both players have shown significant potential and could offer a glimpse into the future of Notre Dame’s quarterback situation.

The decision to sit Leonard should also consider the broader context of the season and the team’s overall goals. If the coaching staff believes that Leonard’s injury is severe enough to warrant a longer recovery period, it may be worth exploring the potential of younger quarterbacks like Minchey and Carr. While this would be a bold move, it could allow Leonard to fully recover while still giving the team a chance to perform well in the interim. If Leonard’s injury is more short-term, then relying on Angeli to manage the games against less challenging opponents could be a prudent approach.

Ultimately, Notre Dame’s coaching staff must make a decision that prioritizes Leonard’s long-term health and the team’s overall success. The risk of further injury, especially with a labrum issue, could have lasting repercussions beyond this season. Allowing Leonard the necessary time to heal could ensure that he returns to form and provides the team with the dynamic playmaking ability they need.

Moreover, this period of adjustment could benefit Leonard mentally as well. The psychological toll of playing through an injury can be significant, affecting a player’s confidence and performance. By stepping back and focusing on recovery, Leonard could regain his mental sharpness and be better prepared to handle the demands of the position upon his return.

However, while the immediate impact of Leonard’s absence is a pressing concern, the broader implications for his health and the team’s future make it crucial to consider sitting him for the upcoming games. By allowing Leonard time to fully recover, Notre Dame can ensure that he returns as a fully capable dual-threat quarterback, ready to contribute at the highest level. The team’s depth at quarterback provides options for managing the interim period, and a careful, measured approach will benefit both Leonard and the team in the long run. The focus should be on making decisions that prioritize long-term health and success over short-term gains, ensuring that Notre Dame is in the best position to compete throughout the season.