Should the Titans Get Creative with Their O-Line Solutions?
The Tennessee Titans are currently facing significant challenges along their offensive line, particularly at the tackle positions. For the past two seasons, fans have witnessed the struggles of Dennis Daley and Andre Dillard at left tackle, leaving a glaring gap in the protection scheme. Recently, rookie J.C. Latham has emerged as a potential solution, showcasing his capabilities despite an underwhelming debut. However, the issues have shifted, with right tackle Nicholas Petit-Frere becoming a focal point of frustration for the team and its supporters.
According to Pro Football Focus (PFF), the pressure statistics for the Titans’ offensive linemen through the first three games paint a concerning picture. Latham, having allowed four pressures, ranks relatively well among rookies. In contrast, both Peter Skoronski and Dillon Radunz have allowed six pressures, placing them in the lower half of the rankings for their position groups. Meanwhile, Petit-Frere’s performance is even more alarming; with nine pressures allowed, he sits at the bottom of the list. This inconsistency raises questions about whether the Titans should explore more creative solutions, including potential shifts in personnel and position.
The immediate concern centers on the struggles at right tackle, a position that has proven to be a significant liability. While Latham has shown promise, Petit-Frere’s difficulties have many fans speculating about possible changes. Unfortunately, the backup right tackle, Jaelyn Duncan, has not inspired confidence either. His performance has drawn unflattering comparisons, suggesting he may be even less effective than Petit-Frere. This leaves the Titans in a tough spot, searching for solutions that may not be readily available on their current roster.
A considerable portion of the fan base has been vocal about moving Skoronski or Radunz to tackle. Skoronski, who excelled at left tackle in college and was a highly regarded prospect, seems like an obvious candidate for a position change. Similarly, Radunz ended last season as the starting right tackle and displayed promising potential, allowing only five pressures in his final five games. Given the current struggles at the position, shifting either player to tackle might appear logical.
However, this approach may not be as straightforward as it seems. Titans’ offensive line coach Brian Callahan has repeatedly stated that Skoronski is a guard. Both he and Radunz practiced exclusively at guard during training camp. The logic here is clear: altering their positions mid-season could disrupt their development and introduce chaos into the offensive line’s structure. Transitioning players with established roles can often lead to more problems than solutions, particularly in an environment where consistency is paramount.
In essence, the Titans must weigh the immediate need for improvement against the long-term development of their young players. While it’s tempting to consider Skoronski or Radunz as potential solutions at tackle, the reality is that they have been working diligently to establish themselves as reliable guards. Forcing them into a new position could hinder their growth and lead to further issues in performance.
Moreover, the Titans need to maintain a focus on developing their existing talent under the guidance of Bill Callahan, an offensive line guru known for refining the skills of his players. Both Skoronski and Radunz have potential, but that potential can only be realized with time, practice, and the right coaching. The focus should remain on enhancing their abilities at guard rather than disrupting the flow by shifting them to tackle.
It’s crucial to consider that the current right tackle solution for the Titans isn’t likely to be found on their roster as it stands. Instead, if Radunz can solidify his role at right guard, it opens the door for a more comprehensive approach to the offensive line’s future. The Titans may need to seek outside solutions—either through free agency or the draft—to find a reliable right tackle who can step in and contribute without causing further disruption.
In the meantime, coaching around Petit-Frere’s weaknesses may be the best strategy. Teams often find ways to maximize their offensive line’s effectiveness through scheme adjustments. This could involve more help from tight ends or running backs on the right side to provide additional protection. Creating a game plan that accommodates the strengths of the players while minimizing their weaknesses is a common tactic employed by successful teams. It’s essential for the Titans to explore these avenues rather than forcing changes that could destabilize the entire line.
The prospect of finding a stopgap player through the practice squad or waiver wire is also an option. The NFL is often rife with talent that, while not glamorous, can provide the necessary support to get through a tough stretch. Veteran players who have experience but may not be starters could serve as valuable assets in stabilizing the offensive line.
Ultimately, patience and perspective are key. The Titans have a talented group of players who need time to develop. By allowing Skoronski and Radunz to grow in their respective roles, the team can build a solid foundation for the future. Moreover, with the 2025 NFL Draft on the horizon, the Titans have an opportunity to reassess their needs and seek out new talent to fill the gaps on the offensive line.
However, while the frustrations with the current state of the offensive line are palpable, the solutions lie not in hastily moving players out of their established positions but in thoughtful development and strategic adjustments. The Titans need to foster the growth of their young talent and consider external options for strengthening their offensive line in the long term. As the season progresses, it will be crucial for the coaching staff to navigate these challenges wisely, ensuring that they set their players up for success while striving for immediate improvement. The Titans’ path forward may be complex, but with the right approach, they can emerge stronger and more resilient.
Leave a Reply